GUANGDONG XIEDA INTELLIGENT EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.
Professional manufacturer of storage space
language
News
News
What issue does low shelf density refer to in warehouse management?
Keywords:
Publish Time:
2025-09-28
In warehouse management, "low shelf density" doesn't simply mean "fewer goods on the shelves"—rather, it refers to Storage efficiency in warehouse spaces—particularly in shelving areas—has not reached a reasonable level, as evidenced by core metrics such as space utilization, pallet location saturation, and storage adaptability, all of which fall below industry benchmarks. This, in turn, triggers a cascade of related issues, including increased costs, reduced efficiency, and heightened operational risks. A systemic phenomenon. At its core lies the "mismatch between spatial resources and storage demands," which requires a deep understanding through three levels: dissecting the phenomenon, analyzing how issues propagate, and identifying the underlying causes.
I. The Core Definition and Essential Meaning of Low Shelf Density
To clarify what exactly "low shelf density" means, we must first dispel the misconception of "looking only at the quantity of goods" and instead establish a multi-dimensional benchmark—specifically, a comprehensive imbalance among "space utilization + shelving configuration + storage efficiency," rather than simply a low value in any single metric.
1.1 The Core Metric Dimension for Shelf Density
Shelf density must be defined jointly by three key indicators; if any one of these indicators is significantly low, the shelf may be classified as having "low density," as detailed in the table below:
|
Measuring Dimensions
|
Core Indicator Definition
|
Industry's Reasonable Range (Data Source: CFLP's "2024 China Warehousing Industry Development Report")
|
Criteria for Determining Low Density
|
|
Space utilization
|
Actual shelf volume / Total available shelf volume
|
General warehousing: 60%-75%; E-commerce warehousing: 55%-70%; Cold-chain warehousing: 50%-65%
|
Below or equal to 10% below the corresponding interval's lower limit
|
|
Cargo space vacancy rate
|
Number of vacant storage spaces / Total number of storage spaces
|
General warehousing: 5%-10%; E-commerce warehousing: 8%-12% (including temporary turnover and vacancy)
|
Long-term vacancy rates exceeding 15%, or temporary vacancies surpassing 20%.
|
|
Storage Compatibility
|
Number of storage locations matching cargo dimensions / Total number of storage locations
|
All storage types should be ≥80%.
|
Below 65%, there is a significant amount of "large items stored in small spaces" or "small items stored in large spaces."
|
1.2 The True Nature of Low Shelf Density: Resource Misallocation, Not "Insufficient Goods"
It is necessary to clarify a key understanding: Low shelf density doesn’t mean there’s insufficient stock in the warehouse. Instead, it’s “having the space but not using it effectively” or “having the goods but placing them incorrectly.” For example: An e-commerce company’s warehouse has a total of 10,000 storage slots, yet only 8,000 items are actually stored. However, due to mismatched slot sizes and product dimensions—specifically, 30% of large slots are used for small parcels—the actual volume occupied amounts to just 45% of the shelves’ total capacity. This scenario—where the warehouse appears full but with low density—is precisely the more subtle kind of density issue in warehouse management.
The fundamental reason for low shelf density is a design flaw.
II. Detailed Analysis of Specific Phenomena in Warehouse Management Caused by Low Shelf Density
From the perspective of real-world warehouse operations, low shelf density primarily manifests in three major categories: "space waste," "idle storage locations," and "imbalanced layout." Each of these categories can further be broken down into specific operational steps.
2.1 Space Waste: The Dual Inefficiency of Vertical and Horizontal Utilization
This is the most obvious manifestation of low-density issues, categorized into two types: "underutilized vertical space" and "untapped horizontal space," both of which are common challenges in traditional warehousing.
- Vertical space waste : The shelf design does not match the warehouse height, or high-level space cannot be utilized due to equipment limitations. For example, in a manufacturing warehouse facility with a height of 12 meters, the shelving was designed only up to 5 meters (since no stacker cranes were installed, relying instead on manual forklifts). As a result, the vertical space utilization rate is just 41.7%, far below the industry standard of 70% typically achieved in 12-meter-high facilities equipped with 6- to 8-meter-tall shelving and stacker cranes. According to the "China Logistics Technology Development Report 2024," only 35% of small- and medium-sized warehousing companies have successfully aligned shelf heights with their building heights, while 65% still suffer from underutilized vertical space.
- Wasted plane space : Excessive shelf spacing, redundant aisle designs, or the presence of "ineffective blank spaces" can lead to inefficiencies. For instance, a food warehouse intentionally set its shelf间距 at 3.5 meters to facilitate manual picking—though forklift operations actually require only 2.5 meters—resulting in a staggering 28.6% waste of floor space. In some warehouses, even "extra reserve areas" were left unutilized over long periods, creating a persistent and unnecessary loss of valuable storage capacity.
2.2 Cargo Space Idle: Temporary Vacancy Coexists with Long-Term Idleness
The storage spaces are not effectively occupied, categorized into "short-term rotational vacancy" and "long-term structural idleness," the latter of which represents the core issue of low density.
- Temporary transitional vacancy : Short-term vacancies caused by order fluctuations and seasonal changes are normal, but exceeding the allowed time frame constitutes a density issue. For example, after JD.com’s “618” mega-promotion, delayed processing of returned goods led to temporary vacancy in 15% of warehouse spaces—normally these spaces should be cleared within 7 days, but when the delay stretches beyond 15 days, they become long-term idle assets. According to a survey by JD Logistics, the average temporary vacancy period for e-commerce warehouses in 2024 was 9.2 days, surpassing the industry’s reasonable benchmark (7 days) by 31.4%.
- Long-term structural idleness : Long-term vacancy caused by unreasonable storage space design and failure to promptly adjust SKUs as they were phased out. For example, a certain home appliance warehouse designed 500 oversized storage spaces specifically for refrigerators, but later the number of refrigerator SKUs was reduced by 50%. As a result, 250 of these spaces remained vacant for over 6 months, resulting in an occupancy rate as high as 50%. Such idle spaces account for more than 60% of issues related to low shelf utilization (Source: iResearch Consulting’s “2024 Warehouse Efficiency Optimization Report”).
2.3 Storage Layout Imbalance: The Hidden Sign of "Mismatched Low Density"
This kind of phenomenon doesn’t directly manifest as "space empty," but rather as "mismatch between goods and storage locations," which ultimately reduces the actual storage density—this is what we call "hidden low density."
- Specification Mismatch : Large storage spaces are used for small items ("a big horse pulling a small cart"), while small storage spaces cannot accommodate larger items ("a small horse pulling a big cart"). For example, a certain 3C warehouse placed headphones (measuring 5cm × 10cm) in a 20cm × 30cm storage bin designed for mobile phones, utilizing only 16.7% of the bin's space. Conversely, if the same bin were used to store a tablet (measuring 30cm × 25cm), the item would spill over its boundaries, spilling into the adjacent bin—and as a result, both bins could hold just one item each, effectively cutting the storage density in half.
- Frequency mismatch High-frequency items are stored in high-level storage locations, while low-frequency items are placed in lower-level ones, resulting in "ineffective space utilization." For instance, a supermarket warehouse stores daily-replenished snacks (high-frequency items) at heights exceeding 5 meters, whereas monthly-replenished grains and oils (low-frequency items) are kept in lower-level positions just 1 meter off the ground. Although no storage spaces appear vacant, the frequent use of stackers to retrieve high-frequency goods from their elevated positions inadvertently leads to low-frequency items occupying the lower-level areas—areas that could otherwise be optimized for higher density. As a result, overall storage efficiency drops by 30% (Source: Head Leopard Research Institute’s "White Paper on Warehouse Layout Optimization").
Traditional heavy-duty beam-type racking
III. Warehouse Management Chain Reactions Caused by Low Shelf Density
Low shelf density is not an isolated phenomenon—it spreads through the "cost-efficiency-risk" loop, creating a systemic impact on warehouse management. Moreover, the severity of the issue is directly proportional to how long the low density persists.
3.1 Cost Side: Unit storage costs have surged, and resource redundancy is severe.
The cost impact of a low-density core is "increased unit costs due to wasted space resources," which specifically manifests in three categories: rent, labor, and equipment.
- Wasted Rental Costs : Warehouse rental fees are typically charged based on area or volume. Low storage density means "paying full rent for space you’re only partially using." For example, if a warehouse leases 10,000㎡ at a rate of 20 yuan/㎡/month, but the low shelf density results in only 6,000㎡ of usable space being utilized, the company would waste 80,000 yuan per month (4,000㎡ × 20 yuan), totaling 960,000 yuan annually. According to CFLP data, for every 10% decrease in shelf density, the unit storage cost (in yuan per item per month) rises by 18% to 22%.
- Human and Equipment Redundancy "Low density requires more manpower and equipment to cover redundant spaces, leading to increased efficiency costs. For example, in a certain logistics warehouse, due to excessively wide shelf spacing, pickers’ average daily walking distance increased from 15 kilometers to 22 kilometers, while their average daily order-picking volume dropped from 300 orders to 220 orders—a 26.7% decline in labor efficiency. Meanwhile, forklifts had to navigate the redundant aisles more frequently, resulting in a 35% rise in equipment energy consumption and a 20% increase in maintenance frequency."
3.2 Efficiency Side: Workflows Stalled, Inventory Turnover Slowed
Low density directly lengthens the warehouse operation chain, leading to reduced efficiency across the entire process—“receiving into storage, storage, picking, and shipping”—and particularly impacting inventory turnover.
- Picking efficiency declines : Empty storage locations and imbalanced layouts lead to longer picking routes. For example, an e-commerce warehouse experienced a 20% vacancy rate in its storage areas, forcing pickers to bypass these empty zones. As a result, the average picking distance per order increased from 50 meters to 80 meters, while picking time rose from 10 minutes per order to 16 minutes per order. Consequently, the daily order-processing capacity dropped from 2,000 orders to 1,250 orders, representing a 37.5% decline in efficiency. According to a survey by Cainiao Network, for every 10% decrease in shelf density below the industry average, picking efficiency can fall by 15% to 20%.
- Inventory turnover slows down : Low implicit density (such as frequency mismatches) leads to delays in goods receiving and shipping. For example: High-frequency items stored at higher levels require stacker cranes during inbound operations, reducing inbound efficiency by 40%. Meanwhile, outbound processes face tight crane scheduling, causing order fulfillment cycles to extend from 24 hours to 48 hours. As a result, inventory turnover days increase from 30 to 45 days, while capital tied up in inventory rises by 50%—calculated based on an annualized interest rate of 4.35%.
3.3 Operational Side: Inventory risks intensify, and expansion pressures surge sharply.
Long-term low inventory levels can trigger two types of risks— "uncontrolled inventory management" and "passive warehouse expansion"—which may negatively impact a company's long-term operations.
- Inventory Backlog and Loss Risk "Low density can easily lead to 'poor inventory visibility,' which in turn triggers stockpiling issues. For instance, a certain apparel warehouse experienced 15% of its storage spaces remaining idle for extended periods. As a result, some out-of-season garments were stored in the corners of these unused areas—areas that weren’t included in routine inventory checks. This oversight led to these items being left unattended for as long as six months, ultimately rendering them unsellable due to outdated styles and causing a loss of 500,000 yuan. Moreover, if idle storage areas aren’t cleaned promptly, they’re prone to dust accumulation and moisture damage, increasing the spoilage rate of adjacent goods—such as paper-packaged products—by 3% to 5%."
- Passive Expansion and Investment Wastage "When business growth demands more storage space, low-density warehousing cannot meet the need through "internal optimization"—it can only respond passively by expanding facilities or leasing new warehouses. For instance, a manufacturing company experienced a 10% annual increase in storage demand. Although its existing warehouse racking system was utilized at just 50% capacity (a figure that could be boosted to 70% with optimized adjustments), the company was forced to lease additional space due to the low density, resulting in an extra annual rental cost of 1.2 million yuan. According to data from iResearch Consulting, passive expansion driven by low racking density accounts for 42% of all warehouse expansion reasons, making it the primary unnecessary investment factor."
IV. The Core Causes of Low Shelf Density and Industry-Wide Pain Points
After understanding the phenomena and issues, it’s essential to trace back to the root causes—low shelf density isn’t a “mere accident,” but rather a clear reflection of systemic shortcomings spanning “planning, operations, and technology,” and these challenges are also common across the industry.
4.1 Planning Level: Early-stage design lacks data support and suffers from insufficient adaptability.
- Shelves not designed based on SKU characteristics : In the early stages, the dimensions, weight, and turnover frequency of goods were not accounted for; instead, "standardized storage locations" were directly adopted. For example, a certain home goods warehouse failed to differentiate between furniture (large items with low turnover) and home accessories (small items with high turnover), uniformly using 1m × 1m × 2m storage bins. As a result, large items couldn’t fit properly, while small items wasted valuable space, leading to a utilization density that dropped below 40%.
- No flexible space reserved : The design did not account for business growth or SKU changes, making it impossible to adjust the storage bin specifications. For example, an e-commerce warehouse initially focused solely on storing clothing (small items), so the bins were designed at 0.5m × 0.8m. Later, when the company expanded into home appliances (larger items), the existing bins became unusable and had to remain idle, causing the storage density to plummet by 25%.
4.2 Operational Level: Inventory management is extensive and lacks sufficient dynamic adjustments.
- SKU Lifecycle Management Missing : Obsolete SKUs are not cleared in a timely manner, occupying valuable storage spaces; meanwhile, newly added SKUs fail to be allocated to appropriate new locations. For instance, at a certain supermarket warehouse, 100 SKUs have been out of stock for 6 months, yet their storage slots remain unliberated, resulting in 10% of the space sitting idle long-term. Meanwhile, the 20 newly introduced SKUs can only be placed in existing slots, further squeezing the already limited available space.
- Lack of a dynamic storage location adjustment mechanism : Failure to adjust storage locations based on order fluctuations (e.g., high-frequency items were not moved to lower levels before major promotions). For instance, an e-commerce warehouse failed to reorganize its storage layout ahead of "Double 11," leaving high-demand goods still stored in upper-level positions. As a result, during the peak promotion period, the stacker cranes were overwhelmed, leading to some storage slots remaining empty (preventing timely restocking) and causing a temporary 30% drop in overall storage density.
4.3 Technical Level: Lack of intelligent tools, reliance on manual expertise
- Without WMS system support : Manual allocation of storage locations makes it impossible to calculate the optimal storage solution. For example, a small to medium-sized warehouse without a WMS system relies on pickers who store goods based on memory, leading to issues such as "similar-sized items stored separately" and "high-frequency items placed at higher levels." As a result, storage density in these warehouses is 28% lower compared to those equipped with a WMS (Source: CFLP’s “Digitalization Report for Small and Medium-Sized Warehouses”).
- Automation equipment has not been introduced. : Without equipment like stackers or AGVs, high-level space remains underutilized. For example, a traditional warehouse relies on manual forklifts (with a maximum operating height of 5 meters), so its shelving is designed only up to 5 meters, while the building itself stands 10 meters tall—resulting in a vertical space utilization rate of just 50%. However, if stackers (operating at a height of 10 meters) are introduced, storage density could increase by as much as 80%.
Finally
In summary, “Low shelf density” in warehouse management is a comprehensive phenomenon characterized by “inefficient space utilization, mismatched storage location allocation, and insufficient storage efficiency.” The core issue isn’t “insufficient goods,” but rather the mismatch between resources and demand—this imbalance can trigger a ripple effect of soaring costs, declining efficiency, and heightened risks, ultimately turning into an "invisible cost center" within warehouse management. To address this challenge, a three-pronged approach is needed: proactive planning (based on data-driven layout design), dynamic operations (with real-time adjustments to storage locations), and advanced technology integration (incorporating WMS systems and automated equipment). By doing so, "low-density spaces" can be transformed into "highly profitable assets." For companies striving to cut costs and boost efficiency, cracking the puzzle of low shelf density essentially means rediscovering the "spatial value" of their warehouses.
Hot Products
Related Articles
Get a free quote
We welcome any inquiry you may have. Tell us about your project to get a free quote.
National Service Hotline
Contact Email
Foshan City, Nanhai District, Shishan Town, Guanyao Ligang Zixia Industrial Zone
Scan to view the website